On the people who say all the right things, yet mean almost none of them.
Some of us take words literally. When you say you will do something, we file it as a fact. Not a maybe. Not a social nicety. A commitment. A real thing that is going to happen.
There are more of us than you might think. People who hear a promise and hold it. People who build something around what you said. People who show up, in part, because you told them you would too.
I am one of those people. For most of my life, this made me reliable by default, because I assumed the world ran on the same operating system. Someone says they will show up, they show up. Someone says they will follow through, they follow through. The words and the action are the same thing, just separated by time.
I have spent years slowly, reluctantly learning that this is not how a significant number of people operate.
There is a type. You have met them. They are warm. Charming, even. They say all the right things at exactly the right moment. They promise to connect, to check in, to show up, to follow through. They come across as genuinely kind, because in that moment, perhaps they are. The intention feels real. The sentiment feels real. The smile is real.
What does not follow is the action.
“They are not lying to you. They are not even lying to themselves.
They are just saying words.”
This is what I have been trying to name, because it is more unsettling to me than dishonesty. Dishonesty involves intent. This is something else: a disconnection between language and meaning. They speak sentences they are not attached to. The words leave their mouth and that is where the relationship ends. They do not circle back. They do not register that you might have held on to what they said. They are already somewhere else.
Meanwhile, you are organising your week around something they said and then forgot they said.
I have started calling this the niceness trap. We excuse these people constantly, and I understand why. They are rarely malicious. They do not seem to have bad intentions. So we absorb the let-down quietly, tell ourselves they are busy, tell ourselves we are being too sensitive, tell ourselves that life gets in the way. We extend the benefit of the doubt once, twice, ten times. We keep re-upping grace we were never asked to provide.
I want to be honest here, because this post would be hollow if I were not. I have done this too. Not with the same pattern, not without awareness, but I have said yes to things I knew, somewhere beneath the words, I could not pull off. Personal situations, mostly, where I said yes to avoid conflict rather than because I meant it. I saw how it landed on the other person. I saw the gap I had created. That moment of seeing it, really seeing it, was uncomfortable enough that I made a decision to do better. I am nowhere near perfect. I am a work in progress every single day. I say that not to soften this post, but because I mean it, and because anyone who has never said something they could not deliver is not being honest with themselves.
The reason I am writing this is not to place myself above anyone. It is to name something that does not get named enough. If someone reads this and it makes them pause, even for a second, and think about how their words land on someone else, then it was worth writing.
What strikes me is not the individual failures. It is the pattern. The same apology. The same explanation. The same soft pivot. The same warmth that makes you want to believe them again. Then the same silence where the follow-through was supposed to be. If you map it out, the pattern is identical every time.
“Three strikes should not even be necessary.
The pattern is usually clear by two.”
Here is the question I keep coming back to: do they ever pause? Do they ever stop and think about what their words actually do to someone? Do they consider that a person made a decision, kept a space open, held hope, because of what they said? That their consistent non-arrival has a real cost, one they never see, because they have moved on before it lands?
If you never feel the gap between what you say and what you do, you will never close it. You cannot correct for something you cannot perceive.
There is a word for the inability to consider your impact on others: narcissism. We tend to reserve that label for the loud, the grandiose, the overtly self-serving. We rarely apply it to the sweet, the charming, the perpetually well-meaning. Yet at its core, narcissism is simply the failure to register that other people are real, that your words land somewhere, that your absence leaves a gap. The nice ones who never show up qualify. They just hide it better.
I am not writing this to assign blame. I am writing it because we talk about lying and manipulation constantly, yet almost never talk about this: the soft, socially fluent version of not showing up. The one that comes wrapped in good intentions and zero accountability. The one that gets excused indefinitely because the person is so nice.
Nice is not the same as present. Nice is not the same as reliable. Nice is not the same as caring about your impact.
Think before you speak. Think about what your words will do once they leave you. Think about the person on the other end who might take them seriously, who might organise something around them, who might wait. Empathy is not complicated. It is simply the act of imagining that other people are as real as you are.
The pattern is always there. You just have to be willing to look at it.
0 Comments