We go into political debates telling ourselves we know what they are: staged, rehearsed, strategic, performative. We watch posture, timing, tone, facial expressions, the clipped line that lands, the stumble that doesn’t. We score it like theater and call it politics. And yet, when the performance ends and the people on stage fail us, we don’t react like disappointed viewers; we react like something personal was taken from us.
Maybe that’s because we never really believed it was just a performance. Maybe performance is how we test for truth when real power feels too distant to measure directly. We say we are only watching to see who “wins,” but beneath that is a quieter hope: show me you can carry the weight, show me you mean what you say, show me there is something underneath the script. When that hope gets exposed as hope, anger rushes in.
So if we know the debate is a performance, why do we still experience the letdown as betrayal rather than entertainment?
0 Comments